Agentic AI governance in operation

Watch an agent cross the line. Then watch Mneme stop it.

Two runnable demos show architecture failures before they land. Then see Mneme block a violating write in a real Claude Agent SDK workflow before it reaches disk.

The change looks useful. The decision says otherwise.

Claude Agent SDK Native integration · Live + deterministic · DENY → PASS

Claude proposes a write. Mneme stops it before disk.

A real Claude Agent SDK workflow receives the governing decision, attempts a violating Write, gets denied, and retries with the compliant change.

Run the Agent SDK proof →
01Claude proposesWrite → storage.py
02Mneme deniesDecision injected · hook returns DENY
03Claude retriesApproved path → PASS

More ways Mneme enforces architecture.

CI boundaries, dependency policy, ADR import, and compliant checks.

Multi-agent governance is the target architecture.

Multi-agent governance Target architecture · Not shipped · Not runnable

Many agents. One rulebook.

The goal: every agent gets the same rule, meets the same check, and leaves one shared record.

Inspect the target contract →
Same rule version Agent + result identity Connected retry record
An engineer reviewing architecture and product flows drawn on a whiteboard
Architecture begins as a plan people can inspect. Agentic governance keeps later changes tied to it.